The Canadian Medical Imaging Inventory: 2022–2023

Details

The Canadian Medical Imaging Inventory collects information on 6 imaging modalities using a web-based survey, supplemented with information from data validators, expert reviewers, and literature searches. The imaging modalities include:

  • CT
  • MRI
  • single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)
  • positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT)
  • positron emission tomography–magnetic resonance imaging (PET-MRI)
  • single-photon emission computed tomography–computed tomography (SPECT-CT)

Body Mass Index as a Measure of Obesity and Cut-off for Surgical Eligibility

Details

This report sought to identify, list, and annotate sources that reported findings regarding the accuracy and/or validity of body mass index (BMI) as a measure of obesity, or as a cut-off for surgical eligibility, including reported ethical issues. Most studies with relevant findings regarding validity and/or accuracy reported discrepancies between BMI and other measurements of obesity, or highlighted concerns with current practices that limit surgical eligibility by BMI for patients who may derive benefit that exceeds the risk of complications.

Oral Feeding for Preterm Infants on Respiratory Support

Details

Question(s)

  1. What is the clinical effectiveness of oral feeding while on continuous positive airway pressure or high-flow nasal cannula in preterm infants?
  2. What are the evidence-based guidelines regarding oral feeding while on continuous positive airway pressure or high-flow nasal cannula in preterm infants?

Key Message

No health technology assessments or systematic reviews were identified regarding the clinical effectiveness of oral feeding in preterm infants while on continuous positive airway pressure or high-flow nasal cannula.

No evidence-based guidelines were identified regarding oral feeding in preterm infants while on continuous positive airway pressure or high-flow nasal cannula that met the criteria for this review.

Pan- Canadian Rare Disease Registries

Details

Optimal use of real-world evidence (RWE) to inform health care decision-making requires timely access to data that are fit for purpose. RWE is particularly important for rare diseases due to smaller numbers of patients and the associated challenges with conducting randomized clinical trials.

With the support of Health Canada, Canada's Drug Agency has launched a learning period to better understand how to optimize the integration of RWE into decision-making processes for drugs for rare diseases.

Treatment Options for VEXAS Syndrome

Details

Question(s)

  1. What is the clinical effectiveness of tocilizumab for patients diagnosed with VEXAS syndrome?
  2. What is the clinical effectiveness of ruxolitinib for patients diagnosed with VEXAS syndrome?
  3. What is the clinical effectiveness of azacitidine for patients diagnosed with VEXAS syndrome?
  4. What are the evidence-based guidelines regarding the treatment options for the management of VEXAS syndrome?

Key Message

VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is a disorder caused by a genetic mutation, and is characterized by hematologic and autoinflammatory symptoms that are severe and progressive. It is typically seen in older men and is considered to be rare. Proposed treatments for VEXAS syndrome include DNA hypomethylating agents such as azacitidine, anti-IL6 monoclonal antibodies such as tocilizumab, and Janus kinase inhibitors such as ruxolitinib. We found 5 non-randomized studies on the effectiveness of the proposed treatments 4 on azacitidine; 1 on ruxolitinib; and 1 on azacitidine, ruxolitinib, and tocilizumab. There are several limitations to the research studies, most notably that they included a small number of patients who were retrospectively identified as having VEXAS syndrome. Therefore, the effectiveness of tocilizumab, ruxolitinib, and azacitidine for treating VEXAS syndrome is uncertain. We did not find any evidence-based guidelines on the management of VEXAS syndrome.

Evusheld for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate COVID-19

Details

Tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld) is a combination of long-acting monoclonal antibodies for intramuscular administration for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19. Canada's Drug Agency conducted a review of the evidence and convened an Implementation Advice Panel to prioritize the patient populations that are most likely to benefit from treatment with Evusheld.

 

Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Adult Patients with Rectal Cancer

Details

Question(s)

  1. What is the clinical effectiveness of transanal total mesorectal excision for adults with rectal cancer?
  2. What is the cost-effectiveness of transanal total mesorectal excision for adults with rectal cancer?

Key Message

Transanal total mesorectal excision may result in lower rates of conversion to open procedure and a better circumferential resection margin compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in adults with rectal cancer.

Transanal total mesorectal excision may be comparable to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for cancer recurrence, survival, death, and short-term safety outcomes in adults with rectal cancer.

Total mesorectal excision may be more cost-effective than laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision in adults with rectal cancer, but this is uncertain.

RWE Learning Project Non-Oncology: Ocaliva

Details

This is a new Canada's Drug Agency project. Projects listed as “in progress” are at various stages and points of completion. These products have different processes and timelines; therefore, the timing of posting of the final reports varies. The Projects in Progress page on the Canada's Drug Agency website is updated on a seven to eight-day cycle. View other current Projects in Progress.

Liposuction for Lymphedema

Details

Question(s)

  1. What is the clinical effectiveness of liposuction compared with no treatment for the treatment of lymphedema?
  2. What is the clinical effectiveness of liposuction compared with alternative treatments for the treatment of lymphedema?
  3. What are the evidence-based guidelines regarding the use of liposuction for the treatment of lymphedema?

Key Message

  • Liposuction with controlled compressive therapy was associated with higher volume reduction compared with controlled compression therapy alone. This finding was from a low- to moderate-quality meta-analysis of 2 prospective cohort studies. The certainty of the evidence is very low.
  • Liposuction was associated with higher improvement in health-related quality of life compared with no treatment. However, the associated data were not reported to enable an independent corroboration of this finding, and the evidence was uncertain.
  • Overall, the evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness of liposuction compared with no treatment was very uncertain because it came from a small number of studies with methodological limitations and poor reporting.
  • Two guidelines recommended the use of liposuction for the treatment of lymphedema.

Intravenous Iron Isomaltoside for Patients with Iron Deficiency Undergoing Elective Surgery

Details

Question(s)

  1. What is the clinical effectiveness of IV iron isomaltoside for patients identified as iron deficient undergoing elective surgery, including high blood loss surgery?

Key Message

The results of 1 randomized controlled trial did not find a difference in functional status (6-minute walk distance and New York Heart Association class), hand grip strength, or health-related quality of life for patients who underwent a transcatheter aortic valve implantation treated with iron isomaltoside versus placebo.

There was 1 (1.4%) hypersensitivity reaction and 1 (1.4%) episode of chest pain in patients treated with iron isomaltoside in the randomized controlled trial. Rates of other adverse events were similar between patients treated with iron isomaltoside and placebo.