Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment for Pediatric Immune Thrombocytopenia

Details

Question(s)

  1. What is the cost-effectiveness of dapsone for pediatric patients with ITP?
  2. What is the cost-effectiveness of rituximab for pediatric patients with ITP?
  3. What is the cost-effectiveness of TPO-R agonists for pediatric patients with ITP?

Key Message

Limited evidence from 1 cost-consequence analysis study showed that eltrombopag was the preferred thrombopoietin receptor agonist over romiplostim (i.e., less expensive and more effective) for treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia in pediatric patients. No cost-effectiveness studies of dapsone or rituximab were identified.

Management of HIV in Primary Care Settings

Details

In 2018, there were close to 62,000 people living with HIV in Canada. As antiretroviral therapies (ARTs) have become easier to access, administer and monitor, and effectiveness has improved, HIV has transitioned from an acute to a chronic condition. Unlike decades past, most people living with HIV live to an age close to the average lifespan. With this increase comes the usual health issues associated with aging combined with the increased complications that are possible with long-term ART.

Hub-and-Spoke Models of Care for Chronic Pain

Details

Chronic pain is defined as pain lasting longer than 3 months, and it affects approximately 19% of adults in Canada. In 2021, Canada's Drug Agency completed an Environmental Scan entitled Models of Care for Chronic Pain. One of the models of care described in the Environmental Scan was the hub-and-spoke model.

This project aims to respond to the questions:

Pharmacological Therapies for COVID-19

Details

This report identifies and summarizes published guidance from Canadian jurisdictions that provide recommendations regarding which pharmacological therapies should (or should not) be used to treat COVID-19 across different severities of illness (i.e., critically ill, moderate to severely ill, mildly ill). In total, 40 publications from several Canadian jurisdictions were included and summarized.

Formulary Management of Biologics in Plaque Psoriasis

Details

Biologics require formulary management strategies upon loss of exclusivity (i.e., data protection and/or patent expiry) to manage expenditures due to a lack of or delay in biosimilar development and market approval. Several old-generation biologics used to treat plaque psoriasis have lost exclusivity but represent a significant portion of expenditures. These biologics often predate pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA) agreements, whereas new-generation biologics, which have head-to-head evidence versus old-generation biologics, have negotiated prices under pCPA agreements.

Enablers for Remote Monitoring Programs for Cardiac Conditions: Lessons From the COVID-19 Pandemic

Details

Key Messages

  • Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, Canada’s health care system has experienced a dramatic shift toward virtual care. Patients with cardiac conditions are at an increased risk of adverse outcomes from COVID-19 infections, and for many, remote monitoring has been viewed as a safer form of health care delivery.
  • This Policy Insight summarizes key facilitators and barriers to the implementation and expansion of remote monitoring programs for patients with cardiac conditions based on lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic. These include:

    Systemic Thrombolysis and Endovascular Therapy for Large Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischemic Stroke

    Details

    Question(s)

    1. What is the clinical effectiveness of systemic thrombolysis combined with EVT compared to EVT alone in patients with large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke?

    Key Message

    Evidence was mixed, with higher-quality evidence suggesting that there were no differences between treatment with alteplase before endovascular therapy or endovascular therapy alone in patients with large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke for outcomes related to safety and efficacy, and lower-quality evidence indicating a difference between the groups for certain outcomes.

    Evusheld (Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab) for the Pre-exposure Prophylaxis of COVID-19 in Adults and Adolescents (≥ 12 Years of Age and Weighing at Least 40 kg)

    Details

    Tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld) is a combination of long-acting monoclonal antibodies for intramuscular administration that provides pre-exposure prophylaxis against COVID-19 for people at risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection who have not had a known recent exposure to an individual infected with SARS-CoV-2. Canada's Drug Agency conducted a review of the evidence and convened an Implementation Advice Panel to prioritize the patient populations that are most likely to benefit from pre-exposure prophylaxis with Evusheld.

    Radioiodine Resensitization for Radioiodine Refractory Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

    Details

    Question(s)

    1. What is the clinical effectiveness of radioiodine resensitization followed by radioiodine in patients with radioiodine-refractory/resistant metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer?
    2. What is the cost-effectiveness of radioiodine resensitization followed by radioiodine in patients with radioiodine-refractory/resistant metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer?

    Key Message

    Evidence of radioiodine resensitization was reported in 4 single-arm clinical trials and 3 uncontrolled retrospective cohort studies, which included between 3 and 20 patients. Over half of patients in these 7 studies demonstrated increased radioiodine avidity after resensitization treatment.Where reported, at least half of radioiodine retreated patients remained progression free and/or had not initiated a new treatment by the end of study follow-up.Adverse events associated with radioiodine resensitization therapies were typically mild, with skin-related adverse events being most common.No studies comparing outcomes of radioiodine resensitization therapies against lenvatinib or to no treatment were identified.No evidence on the cost-effectiveness of radioiodine resensitization therapy was found.

    Ketamine for Adults With Treatment-Resistant Depression or Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

    Details

    Question(s)

    1. What is the clinical effectiveness of ketamine versus placebo or no treatment for adults with TRD or PTSD?
    2. What is the clinical effectiveness of ketamine versus alternative interventions for adults with TRD or PTSD?
    3. What is the clinical effectiveness of ketamine administered via different routes for adults with TRD or PTSD?
    4. What is the cost-effectiveness of ketamine versus placebo or no treatment for adults with TRD or PTSD?
    5. What is the cost-effectiveness of ketamine versus alternative interventions for adults with TRD or PTSD?
    6. What is the cost-effectiveness of ketamine administered via different routes for adults with TRD or PTSD?
    7. What are the evidence-based guidelines regarding the use and administration of ketamine for adults with TRD or PTSD?

    Key Message

    Two randomized controlled trials reported mixed evidence on the efficacy of repeated IV ketamine infusions for improving post-traumatic stress disorder. One randomized controlled trial with small sample size found that repeated IV ketamine infusions significantly improved post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms compared with midazolam in civilian population, while the other randomized controlled trial with larger sample size could not demonstrate a significant efficacy on post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms compared with placebo in military population. The antidepressant effects of ketamine were rapid, but the effects were not sustained after few weeks of post-treatment follow-up.

    One randomized controlled trial comparing IV ketamine with IV esketamine found both treatments had comparable acute antidepressant effects for treatment-resistant depression 24 hours following infusion.

    Two randomized controlled trials provided mixed evidence on the efficacy of single infusion of IV ketamine that was used as anesthetic agent for electroconvulsive therapy for treatment-resistant depression. One randomized controlled trial involving military population showed that patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy for treatment-resistant depression with ketamine anesthesia had similar improvement of depression when compared with patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy with methohexital anesthesia. However, in other randomized controlled trial comparing with propofol-based anesthesia in a civilian population, ketamine-based anesthesia provided faster improvement in depressive symptoms and fewer electroconvulsive therapy treatments to achieve disease remission.

    In a small randomized controlled trial, alternate infusions of subanesthetic dose of ketamine or midazolam with alternate electroconvulsive therapy showed no significant difference in antidepressant effects between groups. The efficacy of oral ketamine was demonstrated in 1 randomized controlled trial that repeated administration of oral ketamine significantly reduced depressive symptoms compared with placebo.

    A small retrospective chart review study showed that repeated administration of intramuscular ketamine had no significant differences in the improvement of depressive and anxiety symptoms compared with repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    Findings suggest overall safety and tolerability of ketamine for treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder or treatment-resistant depression. Most frequent side effects associated with ketamine were dissociative symptoms and cardiovascular changes such as increased blood pressure and heart rate, but these effects were transient. The Danish guideline recommend against the use of IV ketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression, due to low quality and insufficient evidence regarding the lack of long-term efficacy and the risk of abuse of ketamine. Likewise, the Canadian guideline recommends IV ketamine be considered as third-line treatment for adults with TRD, because of the short-lived efficacy of ketamine, its side effects, and the lack of strategies for relapse prevention after ketamine infusions.