Brivaracetam versus Levetiracetam for Epilepsy: A Review of Comparative Clinical Safety

Details

Question(s)

  1. What is the clinical evidence regarding the comparative safety of brivaracetam versus levetiracetam in people with epilepsy with mental health conditions?
  2. What is the clinical evidence regarding the safety of switching from levetiracetam to brivaracetam in people with epilepsy with mental health symptoms related to levetiracetam?

Key Message

Ten nonrandomized studies were included in this report that provided low-to-moderate quality evidence regarding the safety of brivaracetam compared to levetiracetam in patients with epilepsy. Descriptive findings from one study found that in patients with epilepsy with psychiatric comorbidities, treatment with brivaracetam was associated with an improvement in psychiatric and behavioral adverse events such as aggression and depressive symptoms compared to that with levetiracetam. Due to the descriptive nature of results and methodological limitations of the study, the evidence was of low quality. In patients with epilepsy who had mental health symptoms related to treatment with levetiracetam, evidence from all included studies suggested that switching treatment to brivaracetam could improve the occurrences of such adverse events. Two studies found that significantly fewer patients reported behavioral symptoms during brivaracetam treatment compared to that during levetiracetam treatment. Among them one study was conducted in adult patients and the other study was conducted in children and adolescents. Descriptive results from seven other studies also found lower rates of occurrence of psychiatric or behavioral adverse events with brivaracetam than with previous levetiracetam treatment. Due to methodological limitations in the included studies (e.g., observational study design, concurrent treatment with other antiepileptic medications and subjective reporting of adverse events) the quality of evidence was low to moderate and findings should be interpreted with caution.

Codeine for Pain Related to Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Hip: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness

Details

Question(s)

  1. What is the clinical effectiveness of codeine for patients with acute or chronic pain related to osteoarthritis of the knee or hip?
  2. What is the clinical effectiveness of codeine with acetaminophen and/or a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug for patients with acute or chronic pain related to osteoarthritis of the knee or hip?

Key Message

Two systematic reviews with meta-analyses and three randomized controlled trials were identified regarding the clinical effectiveness of codeine with or without acetaminophen or ibuprofen for patients with pain related to osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. While one systematic review did not contain primary studies relevant to this report, one systematic review contained three randomized controlled trials relevant to this report. Although pooled results from one systematic review with meta-analysis suggested that, compared to placebo or no codeine, codeine has a moderate benefit for pain and function in patients with osteoarthritis pain of the knee or hip, codeine resulted in a significantly higher risk for withdrawal due to adverse events. Furthermore, findings from one randomized controlled trial suggested a significantly reduced need for rescue pain medications in the codeine controlled-released versus control group, while two randomized controlled trials did not detect significant differences between codeine plus acetaminophen or ibuprofen versus control groups for this outcome. Finally, findings from all three randomized controlled trials suggested higher rates of adverse events (e.g., nausea, constipation) in codeine versus control groups, with significant differences detected in two randomized controlled trials. Although the systematic reviews were generally well-conducted, the limitations of the included literature (e.g., respiratory depression incidence not reported in systematic reviews and primary studies, co-authors from the drug manufacturer in one primary study, short follow-up durations for all three primary studies) should be considered when interpreting these results. Furthermore, there was a lack of recently conducted primary studies published after 2000, as well as studies comparing codeine with or without acetaminophen or ibuprofen with different opioids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs other than ibuprofen. Finally, there was a limited quantity of evidence for each of the specific codeine combinations (i.e., codeine alone, codeine plus acetaminophen, codeine plus ibuprofen).

Latent Tuberculosis Infection Testing in People with Compromised Immunity Prior to Biologic Therapy: A Review of Diagnostic Accuracy, Clinical Utility, and Guidelines

Details

Question(s)

  1. What is the diagnostic accuracy of using the tuberculin skin test for patients with compromised immunity prior to initiating biologic treatment?
  2. What is the clinical utility of using the tuberculin skin test for patients with compromised immunity prior to initiating biologic treatment?
  3. What are the evidence-based guidelines regarding the testing for latent tuberculosis infection in patients with compromised immunity prior to initiating biologic therapy?

Key Message

Evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of the tuberculin skin test for patients with compromised immunity prior to initiating biologic treatment was available from one systematic review with meta-analyses (that included 16 relevant primary studies) and three additional diagnostic test accuracy studies. The results of these studies were inconsistent. The findings of the systematic review suggested that the coherence between the tuberculin skin test and interferon-gamma release assays was relatively high at 85%; however, the authors of the three diagnostic test accuracy studies concluded that the agreement between the two tests in their study populations was poor or fair. One relevant non-randomized study was identified regarding the clinical utility of using the tuberculin skin test for patients with compromised immunity prior to initiating biologic treatment. This study was non-comparative and was descriptive in nature. The authors noted that the frequency of active tuberculosis infection was 6.8% during 55 months of follow-up after patients initiated biologic therapy, despite being screened for latent tuberculosis using the tuberculin skin test (those who tested positive for the tuberculin skin test were given prophylaxis with isoniazid). Six guidelines that provided recommendations regarding the testing for latent tuberculosis infection in patients with compromised immunity prior to initiating biologic therapy were identified. All six of these guidelines recommended in favour of screening for latent tuberculosis in patients who are candidates for biologic therapy due to their increased risk for developing active tuberculosis. The tuberculin skin test, interferon-gamma release assays, chest x-ray, and chest computed tomography were proposed as viable diagnostic techniques; however, recommendations did not clearly indicate one was preferred over the others in all clinical scenarios. The underlying evidence informing these recommendations was generally of low quality or the recommendations were based solely on the expert opinion of the guideline development groups. The limitations of the included literature (e.g., the lack of an established gold standard for detecting latent TB infection, the unclear generalizability to Canadian settings) should be considered when interpreting the findings of this report.

Care Coordination and Funding of Pediatric Cerebral Palsy in Canada — Project Report


(December 17, 2024)

Abbreviations

Abbreviations Full Name
AB Alberta
BC British Columbia
CP cerebral palsy
CSHCN children and youth with special health care needs
GMFCS Gross Motor Function Classification System
LPN licensed practical nurse
MB Manitoba

Direct Observational Therapy for the Treatment of Tuberculosis: A Review of Clinical Evidence and Guidelines

Details

Question(s)

  1. What is the clinical evidence regarding the provision of direct observational therapy for the treatment of tuberculosis?
  2. What are the evidence-based guidelines regarding the use of direct observational therapy for the treatment of tuberculosis?

Key Message

Three systematic reviews and six randomized controlled trials were identified regarding the clinical evidence for provision of direct observational therapy (DOT) for the treatment of tuberculosis. The evidence suggested that DOT provided by a family member was as effective as DOT provided by non-family members. Evidence regarding the location for the provision of DOT suggested that alternative locations such as at home, at work, or in the community, can be more or similarly effective as DOT provided in health care facilities. The provision of video observational therapy was found to be equally or more effective than DOT. The body of evidence was limited by its heterogeneity and was largely low to moderate in quality Six evidence-based guidelines were identified regarding the use of DOT for the treatment of tuberculosis. Two guidelines provide strong and conditional recommendations, based on low-quality evidence, that DOT should be administered by people trained specifically to provide DOT. One guideline provides a conditional recommendation, based on moderate-quality evidence, to administer DOT in a community setting or at home rather than a health care facility. For the general population, and members of vulnerable or hard-to-reach populations, two guidelines recommend video observational therapy as an alternative to DOT, based on weak evidence.

Trastuzumab Combination and Monotherapy for HER2 Advanced or Recurrent Uterine or Endometrial Cancer: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness

Details

Question(s)

  1. What is the clinical effectiveness of trastuzumab combination therapy or trastuzumab monotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive advanced or recurrent uterine or endometrial cancer?
  2. What is the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab combination therapy or trastuzumab monotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive advanced or recurrent uterine or endometrial cancer?

Key Message

One moderate quality randomized controlled trial (two publications) regarding the clinical effectiveness of trastuzumab combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel alone in patients with HER2 positive uterine serous carcinoma was identified. The trial showed that trastuzumab combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel significantly improved progression-free survival and improved overall survival in patients with advanced and recurrent HER2 positive uterine serous carcinoma compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel alone. High-grade adverse events during and following treatment were not significantly different between the treatment groups. Objective response rate did not differ between groups. No clinical evidence regarding trastuzumab monotherapy or other types of trastuzumab combination therapies (e.g., trastuzumab in combination with cisplatin and paclitaxel or docetaxel), patients with non-serous uterine cancer, other comparators (e.g., docetaxel), or data on quality of life were identified. No studies were identified regarding the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab.

PET Diagnostic Imaging with Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Prostate Cancer: A Review of Clinical Utility, Cost-Effectiveness, Diagnostic Accuracy, and Guidelines

Details

Question(s)

  1. What is the cost-effectiveness of PET imaging using PSMA labelled with gallium-68 (68Ga) or fluorine-18 (18F) in patients with suspected or confirmed metastatic or biochemically recurrent prostate cancer?
  2. What is the diagnostic accuracy of PET imaging using PSMA labelled with 68Ga or 18F in patients with suspected or confirmed metastatic or biochemically recurrent prostate cancer?
  3. What are the evidence-based guidelines regarding the use of PET imaging using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) labelled with 68Ga or fluorine-18 18F in patients with suspected or confirmed metastatic or biochemically recurrent prostate cancer?

Key Message

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer was evaluated as a cost-effective alternative to usual care imaging in one well-conducted economic analysis. The applicability of this study to the Canadian healthcare setting was not clear and the study was limited by the sources of clinical and cost data inputs. Evidence identified on the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET imaging consisted of 197 relevant primary studies compiled in 16 systematic reviews included in this report. This large body of evidence was evaluated by 11 of the included systematic reviews as having significant risk of bias, most commonly associated with the diagnostic reference standard. Additionally, four systematic reviews found evidence of possible publication bias in favour of positive results within the primary study evidence. Despite high heterogeneity and a lack of consistent diagnostic performance outcomes between primary studies, a consensus that PSMA PET provided useful diagnostic performance for recurrent prostate cancer was reported by the systematic reviews. Evidence was also identified from four systematic reviews that suggested that PSMA PET provided greater diagnostic accuracy than radiolabeled choline-based PET. There was also consensus that PSMA PET diagnostic accuracy decreased with decreasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in biochemical recurrence, as observed with other PET radiolabeled tracers. One meta-analysis also reported statistically superior disease detection of PSMA PET as compared to radiolabeled choline PET imaging in patients with lower PSA levels. The authors of the majority of systematic reviews concluded that larger prospective comparative trials with a suitable and consistent reference standard are required to accurately determine diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET and thereby its optimal role in diagnosing patients with recurrence of prostate cancer. One set of guidelines from the US had a relevant recommendation, based on expert opinion, that PET/CT including PSMA PET imaging may be used for patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer as an alternative to conventional imaging.

Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for People with Borderline Personality Disorder: A Rapid Qualitative Review

Details

Question(s)

  1. What are the perspectives and experiences of people with borderline personality disorder, their family and friends, and those involved in their lives and their care, with respect to:
    •  Accessing treatment for borderline personality disorder?
    •  Expectations of treatment for and recovery from borderline personality disorder?
    •  Engaging with dialectical behaviour therapy for borderline personality disorder?
    •  The role of mental health or addiction comorbidities and of systematic inequalities
    (e.g., socio-economic status, lack of housing) in experiences of accessing and undergoing treatment for borderline personality disorder?

Key Message

This rapid qualitative evidence synthesis included 12 primary qualitative studies on the perspectives and experiences of people living with BPD and people involved in their lives on accessing and undergoing therapy for BPD including DBT.

Accessing treatment started with accessing a diagnosis of BPD. People living with BPD found receiving a diagnosis offered them a sense relief and a way forward to treatment. When accessing care for their BPD through non-BPD specialist services, they described facing stigma.

Due to the volatile nature of BPD, people living with the condition identified the need to be able to access services when they were in crisis (i.e., at all hours of the day). People reported facing long wait lists and a lack of specialists when trying to access treatment for their BPD.

For many living with BPD, recovery was seen as a long, hard road with many ups and downs. Recovery was framed not as a return to self but as a shift to another way of being, of being able to cope with emotional distress and symptom reduction in ways that allowed them to engage positively in life, interpersonal relationships and activities such as work and school.

Engaging with DBT was largely described as a positive experience by participants with BPD. Negative views, particularly of group skills training, tended to relate to the content and the way it was delivered. Participants of DBT valued the ability to learn skills from each other through group skills training, and the sense of community that shared learning offered. Individual psychotherapy and telephone support provided additional support for people living with BPD to feel secure and to learn and practice applying their skills.

The recovery process required that people with BPD continually practice applying the skills they acquired through DBT. Once these skills became second nature, they felt that they were making headway towards recovery. People engaging in DBT for BPD appreciated the opportunity for their family and partners to receive information on and training in DBT.

People living with BPD and another mental health condition or substance use found it difficult to find and access appropriate treatment for their conditions. Some described the financial barriers as limiting their ability to access treatment. People living in rural areas who sought care for their BPD described having limited access.

Target-Controlled Infusion with Propofol and Remifentanil for Moderate Procedural Sedation in Medicine and Dentistry: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines

Details

Question(s)

  1. What is the clinical effectiveness of intravenous propofol and remifentanil administered by independent target-controlled infusion pumps for patients undergoing moderate procedural sedation in medicine and dentistry?
  2. What is the cost-effectiveness of intravenous propofol and remifentanil administered by independent target-controlled infusion pumps for patients undergoing moderate procedural sedation in medicine and dentistry?
  3. What are the evidence-based guidelines regarding the use of intravenous propofol and remifentanil administered by independent target-controlled infusion pumps for patients undergoing moderate procedural sedation in medicine and dentistry?

Key Message

One non-randomized single-arm study was identified regarding the safety of intravenous propofol and remifentanil administered by independent target-controlled infusions pumps for patients undergoing moderate sedation for bronchoscopy. No relevant economic evaluations or evidence-based guidelines were identified regarding the cost-effectiveness or use of intravenous propofol and remifentanil administered by independent target-controlled infusion pumps for patients undergoing moderate procedural sedation in medicine and dentistry. Overall, the body of evidence was limited in quantity and quality.Favourable visual analogue scale scores for dyspnea, pain, cough, and anxiety were reported by patients who received intravenous propofol and remifentanil administered by independent target-controlled infusion pumps operated by specialist sedation nurses. Additionally, favourable visual analogue scale scores for dyspnea, pain, cough, and discomfort were reported by bronchoscopists. Desaturation and hypotension occurred in four and two of 32 procedures, respectively, with no occurrence of serious adverse events.

The included study had several methodological limitations. The small sample size (N = 13) and lack of comparison to other sedation strategies should be considered when interpreting the findings of this report. Without comparator groups, it is unclear if these favourable safety outcomes are related to target-controlled infusions of propofol and remifentanil. Furthermore, statistical tests were not performed to evaluate changes from baseline for relevant outcomes.

Outpatient or Short Stay Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty versus Conventional Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness and Guidelines

Details

Question(s)

  1. What is the clinical effectiveness of outpatient or short stay total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional total hip arthroplasty?
  2. What is the clinical effectiveness of outpatient or short stay total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty?
  3. What is the cost effectiveness of outpatient or short stay total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional total hip arthroplasty?
  4. What is the cost effectiveness of outpatient or short stay total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty?
  5. What are the evidence-based guidelines regarding outpatient or short-stay total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty?

Key Message

Three relevant systematic reviews and one relevant economic evaluation were identified.

Generally, rates of complication, readmission, and reoperation were not statistically different or appeared numerically comparable between the outpatient and inpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) groups. Mortality rates were low and appeared to be numerically comparable between the outpatient and inpatient THA groups.

Generally, rates of complication, readmission, and reoperation were not statistically different or appeared numerically comparable between the outpatient and inpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) groups. There were inconsistencies with respect to mortality rates in the outpatient and inpatient TKA groups; this finding was based on two studies included in one systematic review.

Inpatient THA was considered not to be cost-effective compared to outpatient THA at a willingness to pay threshold of US$50,000 as the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for inpatient THA was US$81,116 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) for Medicare and US$140,917 per QALY for private payer insurance.

Findings need to be interpreted in the light of limitations such as evidence of limited quantity and low quality; and lack of long-term data.

No evidence was identified regarding the cost effectiveness of outpatient or short stay TKA.

No evidence-based guidelines regarding the outpatient or short stay THA or TKA were identified.